Evidence Hub

Susceptibility-Guided Versus Empirical First-Line Therapy of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rocha MC, Gaspar T, Bernardes C, Nunes PP

Helicobacter, 2026

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance undermines empirical first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori. We compared susceptibility-guided therapy (SGT) versus empirical therapy in adults receiving first-line treatment, focusing on intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication.

Materials and methods: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 30 September 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized comparative studies (NRS) in adults with confirmed H. pylori. Interventions included phenotypic (culture/E-test) or genotypic (PCR) SGT applied to biopsy, stool, or gastric juice specimens; comparators were empirical regimens including bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) and non-BQT options. The primary outcome was ITT eradication. We pooled risk ratios (RR) with DerSimonian-Laird random-effects, reported I2/τ2, and derived 95% prediction intervals (PI). Subgroups were prespecified by comparator family (BQT vs. other) and specimen/method. Multi-arm studies combined empirical arms within family or split across distinct families.

Results: Forty-two studies met inclusion criteria; all contributed ITT data. RCTs (k = 33) favored SGT over empirical therapy (pooled RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.13; I2 73%; 95% PI 0.92-1.30). NRS (k = 12) were directionally consistent (pooled RR 1.15, 95% CI 1.10-1.22; I2 75%; 95% PI 0.99-1.35). In RCTs, effects were neutral-to-modest vs. BQT (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.97-1.10) and clearer vs. other empirical regimens (RR 1.12, 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free