Evidence Hub

Long-term Oral Suppressive Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis (SATIE Study): An Observational Study

Beaumont AL, Mestre F, Decaux S, Bertin C, Duval X, Iung B, Rouzet F, Grall N et al.

Open forum infectious diseases, 2024

16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The role of suppressive antimicrobial therapy (SAT) in infective endocarditis (IE) management has yet to be defined. The objective of this study was to describe the use of SAT in an IE referral center and the patients’ outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study in a French IE referral center (Paris). All patients with IE who received SAT between 2016 and 2022 were included. Results Forty-two patients were included (36 male [86%]; median age [interquartile range {IQR}], 73 [61–82] years). The median Charlson Comorbidity Index score (IQR) was 3 (1–4). Forty patients (95%) had an intracardiac device. The most frequent microorganisms were Enterococcus faecalis (15/42, 36%) and Staphylococcus aureus (12/42, 29%). SAT indications were absence of surgery despite clinical indication (28/42, 67%), incomplete removal of prosthetic material (6/42, 14%), uncontrolled infection source (4/42, 10%), persistent abnormal uptake on nuclear imaging (1/42, 2%), or a combination of the previous indications (3/42, 7%). Antimicrobials were mainly doxycycline (19/42, 45%) and amoxicillin (19/42, 45%). The median follow-up time (IQR) was 398 (194–663) days. Five patients (12%) experienced drug adverse events. Five patients (12%) presented with a second IE episode during follow-up, including 2 reinfections (different bacterial species) and 3 possible relapses (same bacterial species). Fourteen patients (33%) in our cohort died during follow-up. Overall, the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free