Evidence Hub

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response study of a novel anti-tuberculosis drug to inform its dosage design in phase III clinical trial

Kong W, Liang H, Zhang Y, Li L, Li Y, Yan X, Liu D

European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2025

48 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Although bedaquiline (BDQ) received conditional approval for multi-drug resistance tuberculosis (MDR-TB), a black box warning was added due to QT prolongation risk. WX-081, a promising second-in-class drug that finished phase II clinical trial, exhibited comparable anti-TB activity and better cardiac safety. The accumulation of its active metabolite WX-081-M3 leads to QT prolongation, whereas the relationships between dosage, exposure and response have not been established. Accordingly, the dosage design for phase III study is challenging. Here, the first population pharmacokinetic (PPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analysis were conducted for WX-081. 1610 WX-081 and 1580 WX-081-M3 concentrations were collected from 24 healthy volunteers and 48 tuberculosis patients for PPK study. The pharmacokinetic parameters and sputum culture conversions of 20 MDR-TB patients receiving BDQ and WX-081 were used for E-R analysis. The absorption of WX-081 was well described by a three-compartments transit model, while the distribution and elimination profiles of WX-081 and WX-081-M3 were captured by three- and two-compartments models, respectively. E-R analysis demonstrated that the clinical efficacy of WX-081 is comparable with BDQ and can be evaluated by average concentration at steady state (Cavg,ss) of WX-081. According to the simulation results of different regimens, the dosage of 450 mg once daily (QD) for 1 week and subsequent 300 mg QD for 1 week followed by 150 mg QD for 22 weeks…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 48 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free