Evidence Hub

Ruxolitinib and decitabine plus a busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen for relapse prophylaxis in patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes

Wei Y, Luan S, Wang L, Wang L, Li F, Jin X, Yang R, Qian K et al.

Frontiers in immunology, 2025

58 participants

Abstract

Purpose: Relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure in high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome-IB (MDS-IB) patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Ruxolitinib has demonstrated antileukemic activity in vitro, and decitabine has been found to be tolerable when combined with modified busulfan-cyclophosphamide (mBu/Cy) conditioning regimen. Here, we investigated the efficacy of ruxolitinib and decitabine plus a mBu/Cy conditioning regimen (Rux-Dec-mBu/Cy) in reducing relapse in high-risk AML/MDS patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04582604).

Patients and methods: This prospective investigational study enrolled 58 patients between May 2020 and July 2023. These patients had either a relapsed/refractory status, remission status with adverse genetic abnormalities or positive measurable residual disease (MRD+) prior to conditioning. Ruxolitinib (days -15 to -1) and decitabine (days -15 to -10) were administered, followed by mBu/Cy conditioning. The outcomes of a historical cohort of 58 patients (matched 1:1) who received mBu/Cy are described for reference.

Results: All 58 patients achieved engraftment. With a median follow-up of 967 (464-1597) days, the 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 19.0%. The probabilities of 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 70.3%, 70.6% and 65.2%, respectively. The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 58 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free