Evidence Hub

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation for benign prostatic obstruction: 1-year clinical outcomes of a phase II study

Viitala A, Anttinen M, Mäkelä P, Pärssinen H, Nurminen P, Sainio T, Saunavaara J, Taimen P et al.

BJU international, 2025

30 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA) as a minimally invasive alternative for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).

Patients and methods: This prospective, single-centre, early phase II study (NCT03350529) included 30 men with BPO scheduled for primary transurethral resection of the prostate. Assessments over 12 months included uroflowmetry, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, and validated questionnaires at baseline and 3-month intervals. MRI was performed at baseline and at 3 and 12 months. Medication use and adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results: The median patient age at treatment was 67 years. During the 12-month post-TULSA follow-up, prostate volume decreased from a median of 52 to 32 mL, and PSA levels from 3.1 to 1.5 μg/L. The maximum flow rate increased from 11.1 to 18.3 mL/s (P < 0.001), and the average flow rate from 4.2 to 9.1 mL/s (P < 0.001). Residual volume decreased from 71 to 40 mL, and voided volume increased from 211 to 301 mL. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) decreased from 17 to 4 (P < 0.001), and IPSS quality of life score improved from 4 to 1 (P < 0.001). The 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary irritative/obstructive scores improved from 66 to 94 (P < 0.001), and urinary incontinence scores improved from 86 to 100 (P = 0.008). Sexual function remained stable or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free