Evidence Hub

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in Lyme Disease and Co-Infections: Unraveling Neuropsychiatric and Neurological Complexities-A Comprehensive Case Series Analysis

Kunal Garg, R. Booth, Aiven Cobey, Leona Gilbert, Aylin Ozdemir

Integrative Medicine, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Background/objectives: Lyme disease (LD) and its co-infections present significant diagnostic and treatment challenges due to their complex interplay with neurological symptoms, immune responses, autoimmune reactions, and mental health conditions. Standard two-tier LD testing often fails to detect cases, necessitating expanded serologic and functional testing. Following CARE Guidelines, this case series examines ten clinical narratives of LD, highlighting the limitations of standard diagnostic methods, the potential benefits of specialized testing, and the need for an effective paradigm for LD management.

Methods: A multidisciplinary approach grounded in integrative medicine was adopted. Diagnostic methods included advanced serological panels (e.g., TICKPLEX®), co-infection testing, functional immune markers, Cunningham Panel testing for neuropsychiatric Lyme presentations, and imaging. Treatments included traditional antibiotics, botanical antimicrobials (Cryptolepis, Artemisinin, Biocidin), mitochondrial and neuroprotective support (CoQ10, NAD+, magnesium), nutritional therapies, detox support, immune system support protocols, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, and methylene blue protocols.

Results: The findings from this case series demonstrate the heterogeneity of LD manifestations across different ages, genders, and backgrounds. Compared to promising specialized testing, standard laboratory tests often misdiagnose LD and its co-infections as Parkinson's disease,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free