Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin in treating sinusitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails

Elnaseeh W, Yousif Elamin M, Bandar Alsliham R, Bandar Alotaibi L, Abdulaziz Alaiban H, Fouzy Kattan M, Khalid Alquraini S, Khalid Alkhateeb A et al.

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025

4,201 participants

Abstract

Background: Sinusitis is an inflammation of the paranasal sinuses and is commonly treated with antibiotics. The widely used antibiotics for this condition are macrolides, especially azithromycin. However, its effectiveness and side effects are still questionable compared to the other antibiotics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety profile of azithromycin in sinusitis.

Methods: We adhered to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive literature review was performed to find out about randomized controlled trials concerning azithromycin compared with other antibiotics in sinusitis treatment. The main outcomes were the cure rate, pathogen eradication rate, and relapse rate. The secondary outcome was the adverse events rate.

Results: Fourteen trials were considered for review, with a sample size of 4201 patients. The pooled analysis for included studies indicated a high cure rate (70.86%) and pathogen eradication rate (74.55%), as well as a low relapse rate (4.82%) and adverse events rate (14.33%) for azithromycin in treating sinusitis patients. The quality of the included studies was considered to be moderate. In a meta-analysis, azithromycin demonstrated superiority in the cure rate to other antibiotics in the study but no difference in pathogen eradication rate, relapse rate, or adverse events rate.

Conclusion: Our results showed promising efficacy and safety of azithromycin in the management of sinusitis patients. However, moderate…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,201 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free