Evidence Hub

Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual, rifabutin-based triple, and bismuth quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori rescue treatment: a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised trial

Huang Y, Chen JN, Qiu SH, Guo YX, Li MX, Gao YN, Liang X, Han YH et al.

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2026

120 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Whether vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VA) or rifabutin-based triple study (VRA) can replace bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for Helicobacter pylori rescue treatment remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 10-day VA and VRA regimens, compared with BQT, for rescue therapy.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial at three hospitals in China. Refractory H. pylori-infected patients with at least two previous treatment failures were randomly assigned (1:1:1; block sizes six) to 10 days vonoprazan-containing (20 mg twice daily) regimens of VA (amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily); VRA (amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily, and rifabutin 150 mg twice daily); or BQT (bismuth 110 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, and metronidazole 400 mg, all four times daily). The primary endpoint was H. pylori eradication rate evaluated by 13C-urea breath test. Adverse events were assessed in all patients. Non-inferiority margin was -10%. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05874544).

Findings: Between May 16, 2023, and Jan 31, 2025, 360 subjects (110 [31%] male and 250 [69%] female; mean age 48.4 years [SD 12.1]) were randomly assigned to VA, VRA or BQT (n = 120 per group). Intention-to-treat eradication rates were 75.8% (91/120; 95% CI 67.0-83.0) with VA, 90.0% (108/120; 95% CI 82.8-94.5) with VRA, and 90.8% (109/120; 95% CI 83.8-95.1) with BQT. Non-inferiority of VA to BQT was not established (difference…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free