Evidence Hub

Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis Uncovers High Prevalence Rates of Fluoroquinolone-Resistant Enterobacterales Colonization in Multiple Myeloma Autologous Transplant Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study

Patel C, Terlecky AJ, Baker M, Lozy T, Yen KK, Kaur N, Machere L, Ali A et al.

Cancers, 2026

117 participants

Abstract

Background: Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during autologous stem cell transplantation (aSCT) reduces the risk of fever but raises the risk of bloodstream infection (BSI) with fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales (FRE). We performed a prospective cohort study to detect the presence and potential gain or loss of colonic FRE colonization using serial sampling before and after aSCT in a uniform population of patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Methods: Eligible subjects underwent aSCT after conditioning with dose-intense melphalan, 200 mg/m2. Peri-anal swabs were obtained before aSCT, upon hospital discharge, and 12-16 weeks after transplantation. Samples were cultured in tryptic soy broth supplemented with either ciprofloxacin or ceftriaxone with subsequent plating onto selective chromogenic agar designed to facilitate recovery and differentiation of Enterobacterales. Results: FRE colonization on pre-transplant sampling was detected for 23 of 117 subjects (19.7%) and 29 of 98 (29.6%) subjects at hospital discharge after a course of fluoroquinolone (116/117 subjects) prophylaxis (p Conclusions: We hypothesize that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis of subjects with undetected low levels of FRE colonization allows the expansion of the FRE population, placing subjects at risk of BSI with fluoroquinolone-resistant (and ESBL-expressing) Enterobacterales. Pre-transplant testing for FRE colonization permits patient-specific design of prophylactic and empiric antibiotic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 117 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free