Evidence Hub

A prospective randomized crossover trial investigating melatonin versus sleep deprivation for sleep induction in nap electroencephalography

De Giorgis V, Varesio C, Celario M, Quaranta CA, Ferraro F, Pasca L, Fedele G, Papalia G et al.

Epilepsia open, 2026

33 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electroencephalography (EEG) plays a fundamental role in the diagnosis and classification of epilepsy, and inducing sleep during EEG can improve patient cooperation and enhance the detection of epileptiform activity. Despite its importance, there is currently no standardized approach for sleep induction in pediatric EEG recordings. Consequently, practices such as melatonin administration and sleep deprivation are commonly utilized. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 5 mg melatonin versus partial sleep deprivation in inducing sleep during nap-time EEGs in children with epilepsy.

METHODS: A randomized crossover trial was conducted involving 33 participants (mean age 14.5 years), each undergoing EEG following either melatonin administration or partial sleep deprivation. In the melatonin arm, participants received an oral dose 30 min before the recording, while in the sleep deprivation arm, sleep was restricted the previous night. The primary outcome was sleep onset latency, defined as the time from relaxation to non-REM stage 2 sleep on EEG. Additionally, melatonin and its metabolite, 6-hydroxy-melatonin, were measured using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

RESULTS: The study showed a mean sleep onset latency of 8.5 min after sleep deprivation and 10.1 min after melatonin administration, with a mean difference of 1.5 min. The analysis of covariance conducted with stratification based on sleep onset latency (five…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 33 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free