Evidence Hub

Effects of Ramelteon on Sleep and Neurobehavioral Performance in a Simulated Night Shift Preceded by a Sleep Opportunity

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2008

11 participants

Abstract

Night shift-workers are often advised to take a prophylactic nap prior to starting the shift in order to improve alertness and performance. However, individuals often report difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep at that time of the day secondary to the alerting influence of the near-24 hour circadian rhythm (biological clock). A sleep-promoting medication may improve the quality of an evening nap and subsequent alertness and performance during a night shift. We will use Ramelteon, a melatonin agonist that is FDA approved for insomnia, in order to test the following hypotheses:

1. ramelteon, compared with placebo, will significantly increase sleep efficiency during a 2-hour nap;

2. sleep inertia, as assessed by neurobehavioral tests and subjective and objective sleepiness assessments will not be significantly increased after ramelteon treatment compared with placebo treatment; and

3. neurobehavioral performance, subjective and objective sleepiness, and subjective mood during a simulated 8-hour night shift will be significantly improved when ramelteon is given prior to a prophylactic nap compared to a prophylactic nap with placebo.

Conditions: Healthy.

Primary outcome: Sleep Efficiency.

Enrollment: 11 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free