Evidence Hub

Coptidis Rhizoma for Obesity, Diabetes, and Dyslipidemia: An Integrated Meta-Analysis and In Silico Study

Kang CY, Yoo YJ, Kim JH, Yoo SH, Kim HJ, Lee MS, Lee BC

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

1,718 participants

Abstract

Obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia form an interconnected metabolic disease cluster driven by insulin resistance and chronic inflammation. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and multi-target mechanisms of Coptidis Rhizoma for these metabolic disorders through an integrated systematic review, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), network pharmacology, and molecular docking. Meta-analysis of 19 RCTs (n = 1718) demonstrated that Coptidis-containing formulations, primarily as adjunctive therapy, significantly improved primary clinical endpoints across all three metabolic conditions: body mass index (BMI: SMD = -0.72, 95% CI [-1.00, -0.44], p p p < 0.00001). Network analysis revealed shared targets enriched in lipid metabolism, inflammatory signaling, and PI3K-Akt/MAPK cascades. Molecular docking demonstrated favorable structural compatibility and predicted docking scores (ranging from -7.1 to -9.5 kcal/mol) of berberine toward key hub proteins, including PIK3CA, JAK2, MAOA, and PARP1. Consequently, Coptidis Rhizoma provides tangible clinical benefits across interconnected metabolic outcomes via the multi-target regulation of inflammatory and insulin signaling pathways. Clinically, Coptidis-containing formulations show promise as a complementary adjunct to conventional metabolic therapies, though future large-scale, standardized RCTs remain necessary to confirm long-term safety and optimize dosing regimens.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 1,718 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free