Evidence Hub

Genetic and Behavioral Variation Underlying an Integrated Temporal Phenotype in an Admixed South American Population

Marchesano M, Spangenberg L, Casaravilla C, Castillo Stratta J, Silva A, Tassino B

2026

38 participants

Abstract

Chronotype is a complex trait reflecting individual differences in the temporal organization of rest and activity, with important health implications. The Uruguayan population, characterized by a tri-hybrid origin (African, European, and Indigenous), exhibits a bias toward eveningness. The genetic variation in clock genes underlying chronotype in this population remains unexplored. To address this gap, we analyze healthy young adults from the extremes of the chronotype distribution (early, n = 37; late, n = 38; 63% female; 23.1 ± 3.4 years), integrating self-reported measures, actigraphy, and low-pass whole-genome sequencing. Global ancestry is predominantly European, with Indigenous and African components, and does not differ between chronotypes. Variant density is highest in PER2. T-allele carriers of a PER2 variant previously associated with late chronotypes (rs35333999) differ from non-carriers in activity acrophase. Multidimensional scaling of variants across 19 canonical clock genes reveal differential representation of early and late chronotypes across genetic clusters. When examined by functional groups, the signal is restricted to genes involved in degradation of the circadian clock's repressor arm, with BTRC, a mediator of PER2 degradation, showing the same pattern when assessed individually. We derive a joint behavioral component capturing the variation in food intake, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, light exposure, and sleep timing, which correlates with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 38 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free