Evidence Hub

Sleep-Wake Disturbances in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Interventions

Lofitou K, Kouki EP, Gavriel C, Achilleos H, Themistokleous V, Bargiotas P, Haarbauer-Krupa J, Paraskevopoulos E et al.

Brain and behavior, 2026

1,113 participants

Abstract

Background: Sleep-wake disturbances (SWD) are frequent and persistent complications following pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), negatively affecting cognitive, emotional, and academic outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral, pharmacological, and emerging interventions for SWD in children and adolescents with mild to severe TBI and examined related sleep outcomes and functional measures.

Method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect for studies published between 1998 and 2025. Nineteen studies (N = 1113) met inclusion criteria, encompassing cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), sleep hygiene, mindfulness, pharmacological treatments (melatonin, branched-chain amino acids), physical activity, and family-based interventions. Meta-analytic models using random effects were employed to calculate pooled standardized mean differences and mean raw scores across sleep, cognitive, and quality-of-life outcomes.

Results: CBT-I demonstrated efficacy in reducing persistent post-concussion symptoms and improving subjective sleep outcomes, although heterogeneity varied across outcomes. In contrast, melatonin did not produce statistically significant pooled effects on persistent post-concussion symptoms or cognitive outcomes, and treatment effects varied across dosage groups. Few studies examined mindfulness or educational outcomes, revealing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,113 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free