Evidence Hub

Safety and Efficacy of Melatonin for Sleep Disorders in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Abbasi MM, Pasha S, Khosravi F, Boskabadi AR, Jamshidi F, Rahimian Z, Eini P, Talebi Y et al.

Current reviews in clinical and experimental pharmacology, 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE

Sleep disruption is common among patients with malignancy and may worsen quality of life, treatment tolerance, and symptom burden. Melatonin is a circadianregulating hormone with a favorable safety profile and potential sleep-promoting effects. This metaanalysis and systematic review evaluated the safety and efficacy of melatonin for sleep-related outcomes in patients with cancer.

METHODS

Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception to 1 June 2026 without language or country restrictions. Randomized clinical trials comparing melatonin with placebo or an active control in patients with cancer and reporting sleep-related outcomes were eligible. Data extraction, study selection, and riskof- bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist were performed by two reviewers independently. Random-effects meta-analyses with Hartung-Knapp adjustment were conducted in Stata 17.0.

RESULTS

Data from seven studies were pooled in the meta-analysis, and thirteen articles were included in the systematic review. The overall effect of melatonin was insignificant (SMD = -0.85 with a 95% CI of -2.46 to 0.76) with high heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 94.5%). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant decrease in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in US studies (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI: [-0.99, -0.14], I2 = 31.5%). Meta-analysis of the seven PSQI components showed no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free