Evidence Hub

Sleep-modulating pharmacological interventions for delirium prevention: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chen H, Zhao Y, Li Y, Chen W, Tan X

Sleep medicine reviews, 2026

5,045 participants

Abstract

Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric syndrome among hospitalized patients and has been linked to disturbances in sleep and circadian regulation. We conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating sleep-modulating pharmacological interventions for delirium prevention. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched through August 2025. Thirty-three trials involving 5045 patients were included. In the random-effects model, melatonin and melatonin receptor agonists were associated with a lower risk of delirium compared with non-active control conditions (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.64-0.92). Evidence from suvorexant trials was also associated with a lower delirium risk (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27-0.95), whereas midazolam-based benzodiazepine evidence did not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in delirium risk (RR = 1.64, 95% CI: 0.81-3.31). Subgroup analyses suggested that the association for melatonin-based interventions was more evident in non-ICU and surgical populations. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. Melatonin-based interventions and suvorexant were associated with lower delirium incidence; however, evidence directly comparing different active interventions remains limited, and findings should be interpreted cautiously given the agent-specific evidence base. Further direct comparative trials are needed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of sleep-modulating pharmacological interventions for delirium prevention.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,045 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free