Evidence Hub

“Salivary dim-light melatonin onset in early Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis predicts functional decline, respiratory symptom emergence, and survival”

Bombaci A, Iadarola A, Giraudo A, Fattori E, Sinagra S, Magnino A, Calvo A, Chiò A et al.

2026

28 participants

Abstract

Background: Sleep–wake and circadian disturbances are increasingly recognised in people living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (plwALS), but endogenous circadian phase timing and its prognostic significance in early disease remain unclear. We assessed whether salivary dim-light melatonin onset (DLMO), an objective marker of central circadian phase, is altered in early plwALS and whether it provides prognostic information.

Methods: In this prospective longitudinal observational study, plwALS within 18 months of symptom onset underwent home-based salivary melatonin sampling under dim-light conditions at six predefined time points around habitual sleep onset (HSO). Melatonin profiles were modeled using cubic smoothing splines, and DLMO was defined as the first time the fitted curve reached 3 pg/mL. Clinical, respiratory, and sleep assessments were collected at baseline (T0) and after 6 months (T6); a subgroup repeated saliva sampling at T6. Age- and sex-matched controls underwent melatonin profiling. Associations with disease progression, incident respiratory symptoms, and survival/tracheostomy were examined using regressions and survival analyses.

Results: Fifty plwALS were enrolled. Compared with controls, plwALS showed an earlier DLMO (20:24±1:18 vs 20:58±0:50; p=0.028) despite similar HSO and chronotype. Within ALS cohort, a later baseline DLMO correlated with worse functional/motor status, faster progression of disease, incident dyspnea/orthopnea by T6 (adjusted OR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 28 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free