Evidence Hub

Trends in the antibiotic resistance of S. aureus clinical isolates: a 4 years retrospective study in a teaching hospital in South Italy

Ronga L, Abbasciano A, Calia C, Mosca A, Battista M, Sparapano E, De Carlo C, Miragliotta G et al.

Le infezioni in medicina, 2019

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for life-threatening conditions, while in the meantime it has rapidly acquired resistance to several antibiotic classes. In the context of an effective empirical antibiotic therapy, an accurate evaluation of the resistance rates of S. aureus may be critical. The aim of this study was to determine the resistance rates of S. aureus in the years 2015-2018 and to assess the impact of specimen stratification on the resistance rates. We have retrospectively analysed S. aureus strains isolated from blood, bronchial aspirate, pus, sputum and urine collected from hospitalized and ambulatory care patients. The comparison between resistance rates from 2015 to 2018 and among different specimens was assessed by Fisher's exact test followed by Benjamini and Hochberg's correction of the p-values. Higher resistance rates were detected for penicillin followed by oxacillin, levofloxacin, erythromycin and clindamycin. Differences in the annual resistance rates were not statistically significant after the BH's correction. The comparison between cumulative S. aureus resistance rates stratified by specimens showed some statistically relevant differences among the five specimen types. In particular, p-values were statistically significant for clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, oxacillin, penicillin and vancomycin. Annual resistance rates of S. aureus clinical isolates remained constant over the course of time. Moreover, the stratification of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free