Evidence Hub

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for managing sleep disorders in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review

Jaiswal N, Fisher L, Ciminata G, Mulholland R, Noel-Storr A, Nutton L, Orr V, Eunson P et al.

Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2026

19 participants

Abstract

AIM

To systematically review the effectiveness, safety, and economic evidence of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for sleep disorders in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

METHOD

Databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization, NHS Economic Evaluation Database, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to May 2026. Randomized controlled trials and economic evaluations were eligible. Primary outcomes included sleep quality, adverse events, and tolerability. We incorporated interest holder perspectives, including clinicians and individuals with lived experience, throughout outcome prioritization and interpretation. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool and evaluated the certainty of evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS

Twelve randomized controlled trials (n = 19-142, aged 5-17 years) were included. Pharmacological (melatonin, cannabis-based medicines, baclofen, neural stem cells) and non-pharmacological interventions (massage, cranial osteopathy, music therapy, acupuncture, postural support) were evaluated. Melatonin improved sleep latency and duration modestly compared with placebo. Other interventions showed inconsistent or negligible effects. Adverse events were mild and tolerability acceptable. No completed economic evaluations were identified. Interest holders highlighted…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 19 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free