Evidence Hub

Optimizing timing and dose of exogenous melatonin administration in neuropsychiatric pediatric populations: a meta-analysis on sleep outcomes

Bruno S, Cenerini G, Lo Giudice L, Cruz-Sanabria F, Benedetti D, Crippa A, Fiori S, Ferri R et al.

Sleep medicine reviews, 2025

6 citations

Abstract

Melatonin is known to be effective in improving sleep in pediatric patients affected by neurological and psychiatric conditions. However, no guidelines exist advising the most effective treatment schedule. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the dose, time of administration and treatment duration associated with the maximal treatment efficacy. The systematic search, conducted across multiple databases following PRISMA guidelines and including studies published up to April 30, 2024, yielded 21 studies. Mean differences in sleep-related variables between the treatment and the placebo group were considered as study outcomes. Dose-response curves and meta-regression models were fitted to test the effect of treatment-related parameters. Melatonin significantly reduced Sleep onset latency and increased Sleep efficiency and Total sleep time. Sleep onset latency reduction was associated with an advancement in the time between administration with respect to bedtime, while increased Sleep efficiency and Total sleep time with longer treatment durations. Melatonin reached the maximal efficacy between 2 and 4 mg/day. Our results suggest a dose and time of administration that may enhance melatonin's sleep promoting effects (2-4 mg, 3 h before bedtime) and, if replicated by large clinical trials, could guide clinical practice in managing sleep disturbances in children experiencing neuropsychiatric conditions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free