Evidence Hub

Drug treatment of primary insomnia: a meta-analysis of polysomnographic randomized controlled trials

Winkler A, Auer C, Doering BK, Rief W

CNS drugs, 2014

3,820 participants

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although insomnia is a frequent health complaint that is often treated with drugs, little is known about differences in treatment efficacy of various drug classes on objective versus subjective outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare treatment efficacy of classical benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists (zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon), antidepressants (including low-dose doxepin), neuropeptides, progesterone receptor antagonists, hormones, melatonin receptor agonists, antihistamines, antiepileptics, and narcotics addressing primary insomnia.

DATA SOURCES: We conducted a comprehensive literature search (up to 5 April 2013) using PubMed, Cochrane Clinical Trials, PQDT OPEN, OpenGREY, ISI Web of Knowledge, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only polysomnographic, parallel-group, randomized controlled drug trials were included; eligibility was determined by two independent authors.

DATA SYNTHESIS: We used a random effects model, based on 31 studies reporting 80 treatment conditions, covering 3,820 participants.

RESULTS: Effect size estimates for the total sample of pooled drug classes suggest that there is a small-to-moderate, significant, and robust effect for objective outcomes (sleep onset latency g = -0.36, total sleep time g = 0.27) and subjective outcomes (sleep onset latency g = -0.24, total sleep time g = 0.21). Results indicate higher effect sizes for benzodiazepine…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,820 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free