Evidence Hub

Melatonergic agents in the prevention of delirium: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yang CP, Tseng PT, Pei-Chen Chang J, Su H, Satyanarayanan SK, Su KP

Sleep medicine reviews, 2020

913 participants

Abstract

Disruption of the sleep-wake cycle is a risk factor and a prodromal indicator of delirium. Melatonergic agents may thus play a role in the prevention of delirium. Based upon literature search on eight databases, this systemic review and frequentist model network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of melatonergic agents in delirium prevention. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with a total of 913 adult participants (mean age = 78.8, mean female proportion = 59.4%) investigating the preventive effects of melatonergic agents in patients with high risks of developing delirium. The outcomes of NMA demonstrated significant preventive effects with 5 mg/day of melatonin [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.21, 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs): 0.07 to 0.64], melatonin (0.5 mg/d) [OR = 0.16 (95% CIs: 0.03 to 0.75)], and ramelteon (8 mg/d) [OR = 0.28 (95% CIs: 0.12 to 0.65)] against placebo groups. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA), 0.5 mg/d of melatonin was associated with the best preventive effect. Our findings provided the rationale for recommending low-dose melatonergic agents for delirium prevention in the practice guidelines.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 913 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free