Evidence Hub

Digital screen exposure and migraine burden: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gowda N, Harish S, Tej G

Journal of neurology, 2026

14,763 participants

Abstract

Background: Digital screen exposure has risen sharply across paediatric, adolescent, and adult populations, and many individuals with migraine report that screen use triggers or worsens attacks.

Objective: To systematically review and meta-analyse the association between digital screen exposure and migraine/headache burden, including frequency, severity, disability, and related secondary outcomes, and to summarise the proposed neurobiological mechanisms.

Methods: This review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261404162) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance. Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched without date restrictions for English-language observational and interventional studies of adolescents or adults with migraine or primary headache and a quantifiable measure of digital screen exposure. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using a modified Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)/AHRQ checklist for cross-sectional and observational studies. When ten or more studies reported an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for migraine or headache risk associated with higher versus lower screen exposure, a random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) meta-analysis was performed. Heterogeneity was quantified with I2 and Cochran's Q; small-study effects were assessed with Egger's regression; and robustness was evaluated with a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Outcomes not…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 14,763 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free