Evidence Hub

Impact of artificial light at night on obesity and overweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tang W, Dong S, Li Y

BMC public health, 2025

867,647 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background: Global obesity rates are rising sharply, prompting interest in environmental drivers beyond diet and activity. Widespread artificial light at night disrupts circadian rhythms and metabolism. potentially elevating obesity risk, but evidence syntheses are outdated and limited.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of databases including PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Eligible observational studies (cohort or cross-sectional) were required to report adjusted risk estimates (odds ratio [OR], relative risk [RR], or hazard ratio [HR] with 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]) for obesity or overweight, with quantifiable LAN exposure. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies and the AHRQ criteria for cross-sectional studies. A random-effects model was applied for effect size pooling, alongside subgroup analyses stratified by geographic region, age, and sex, supported by sensitivity analyses and Egger's test for publication bias assessment.

Results: Our analysis included 13 studies involving 867,647 participants (9 cross-sectional and 4 cohort studies). A significant 14% increased risk of obesity was observed in the highest LAN exposure group compared to the lowest (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.22; I² = 92.5%, P 0.05).

Conclusions: Exposure to LAN significantly correlates with increased obesity and overweight risks, influenced by geographic and age-specific factors. These results highlight LAN as a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 867,647 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free