Evidence Hub

Factors influencing treatment outcomes in patients with isoniazid-resistant pulmonary TB.

Velayutham B, Shah V, Mythily V, Gopalaswamy R, Kumar N, Mandal S, Parmar M, Padmapriyadarsini C

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, 2022

11,519 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with isoniazid (H, INH) resistant pulmonary TB but undetected rifampicin (R, RIF) resistance are treated with a 6-month regimen of levofloxacin-RIF-ethambutol-pyrazinamide (6LvxREZ) under India´s National TB Elimination Programme (NTEP).OBJECTIVE: To describe the profile of and treatment outcomes in patients with pulmonary INH-resistant (INHR) TB initiated on TB treatment, and identify factors associated with unfavourable treatment outcomes (died, failed, treatment changed, lost to follow-up).METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of NTEP database (Ni-kshay) on pulmonary INHR TB patients initiated on treatment with "H mono/poly regimen" (6LvxREZ) between July 2019 and June 2020 with documented treatment outcomes. Proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated and logistic regression analysis was performed.RESULTS: Of the 11,519 patients with pulmonary INHR TB, 9,440 (82%) had treatment success (55.1% cured, 26.9% treatment completed). Unfavourable treatment outcome was observed in 1,901 (16.5%). Male sex, tobacco and alcohol use, HIV reactive status were associated with unfavourable treatment outcome. Patients with katG mutations and resistance to fluoroquinolones were likely to have poor treatment outcomes.CONCLUSION: A levofloxacin-based regimen offers a treatment success rate of 82% in patients with pulmonary INHR TB. Sex-specific strategies, interventions to address smoking and alcohol use, focus on HIV-reactive patients and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 11,519 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free