Evidence Hub

Biomarker evidence for the pathophysiological mechanisms of insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Wang Y, Wang PC, Ji JF, Feng X, Wang ZH, Ma TS, Diao DL, Yi L

Frontiers in immunology, 2026

4,578 participants

Abstract

Background: Insomnia is increasingly recognized as a systemic disorder involving persistent hyperarousal, neuroendocrine dysregulation, immune activation, and impaired stress adaptation. However, circulating biomarkers reflecting these interconnected biological processes have not been comprehensively synthesized.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing circulating biomarkers between adults with insomnia and healthy controls. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random- or fixed-effects models as appropriate. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessments were performed to evaluate the robustness and certainty of the evidence.

Results: Thirty-two studies involving 4578 individuals with insomnia and 28382 healthy controls were included. Cortisol levels were significantly elevated (SMD = 3.65, 95% CI: 2.35 to 4.95). Inflammatory biomarkers, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), were significantly increased, whereas interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) showed no significant differences. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) was significantly reduced (SMD = -0.85, 95% CI: -1.27 to -0.43), while corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,578 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free