Evidence Hub

Limited Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions for Improving Postoperative Sleep Quality in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Namazi N, Salmani A, Ayati A, Mehrvar A, Poursalehian M, Hajiaghajani S

The Journal of arthroplasty, 2026

2,934 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sleep disturbances are common after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and are associated with impaired recovery, increased complications, and prolonged hospital stays. Although various pharmacological interventions have been evaluated to improve postoperative sleep quality among TJA patients, consensus on their efficacy and safety remains elusive.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered the protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed on October 5, 2024, with no language or publication date restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacological interventions versus routine postoperative care in TJA patients were included. Data on subjective sleep quality scores and objective measures like actigraphy and polysomnography were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) RCT tool. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. There were 24 studies involving 2,934 patients included.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis revealed that zolpidem significantly improved sleep quality (Hedges' g = -1.510; P < 0.001) and enhanced objective sleep parameters up to three weeks postoperatively.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,934 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free