Evidence Hub

Nutritional supplements and cognition in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Liu X, Yang C, Wang X, Liao H, Liu H, Ma J, Sun Y, Wang H

The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease, 2026

Abstract

Background: Nutritional supplementation is increasingly regarded as a potential strategy to preserve or enhance cognitive function in individuals with healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, its overall efficacy remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings across clinical trials.

Methods: In accordance with the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Network Meta-Analyses, we conducted a comprehensive systematic search. Our inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the impact of nutrient supplementation on cognitive function within healthy aging and MCI patients. The primary outcome of interest was the change in cognitive function, while the secondary outcome involved alterations in blood biochemical markers (e.g., homocysteine, vitamin B12, and serum folate levels).

Results: The meta-analysis results indicated that docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)+eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin, as well as melatonin alone, significantly enhanced global cognitive function. Additionally, DHA, folic acid+DHA, and the DHA+EPA+vitamin E+tryptophan+melatonin were all effective in augmenting memory. DHA alone was found to be beneficial in improving processing speed, whereas vitamin D3 was associated with improvements in visuospatial function. Notably, sensitivity analyses revealed that while most domain-specific effects remained stable, the rankings of certain…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free