Evidence Hub

Sleep and Circadian Interventions to Improve Athletes' Mental Health, Mood and Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Walsh E, Leota J, Huynh M, Liddle SK, Drummond SPA, Facer-Childs ER

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Sleep and circadian interventions (e.g. interventions aimed at promoting circadian alignment and supporting stable well-entrained sleep-wake patterns) are predominantly implemented in athletes to improve performance, recovery and adaptation to travel. Emerging evidence from the broader population demonstrates that improving sleep and circadian health can also improve mental health, mood and well-being.

Objectives: To evaluate the current evidence on the effectiveness of sleep and circadian interventions for improving mental health, mood and well-being in athlete populations.

Methods: Seven databases (CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, SPORTDiscus) were searched from inception to 23 September, 2024 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies involved athletes (participating in sport at any level) and evaluated sleep or circadian interventions aimed at improving sleep and/or circadian health, with mental health, mood or well-being outcomes. Sleep interventions directly manipulated sleep through behavioural, environmental or educational approaches. Studies without a comparator/baseline, using indirect methods (e.g. brainwave entrainment) to improve sleep or solely sleep restriction, were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Joanna Briggs…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free