Evidence Hub

Comprehensive effects and dose-response relationship of screen exposure on university students' physical and mental health and academic performance in the digital age: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zeng Z, Shi Z, Hou S, Yan J, Yang R, Li X

BMC public health, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the impact of total screen time on university students' health outcomes and academic performance, and to explore its dose–response relationship. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched to collect studies related to university students' screen time, with the search period from inception to July 2025. After two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed quality, meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 software. The pooled effect sizes were the reported odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Additionally, dose–response analysis was performed using R 4.4.3 software, and restricted cubic splines were used to fit the non-linear dose–response curve at fixed knots of the exposure distribution. RESULTS: A total of 69 cross-sectional studies and 3 longitudinal studies were included, comprising 71,633 university students. Meta-analysis results showed that screen time was significantly associated with an increased risk of depression (OR = 1.93; 95%CI: 1.75–2.12) and digital eye strain (OR = 1.96; 95%CI: 1.67–2.31). Dose–response analysis further revealed that after daily screen time exceeded 2.5 h, the risks of depression and digital eye strain increased sharply, with the risks increasing by more than 15% for each additional hour of screen exposure. In addition, screen time was also significantly associated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free