Evidence Hub

The association between clock gene polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Joshi D, Pigeyre M, Ali MU, de Mutsert R, Rutters F, Campbell D, Despres JP, Borhan S et al.

Diabetes & metabolic syndrome, 2025

535,063 participants

Abstract

Background: Misalignment of the endogenous circadian system may contribute to the risk of type 2 diabetes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between clock gene polymorphisms and glycemic parameters and type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to August 20, 2024. Empirical studies examining the association between core clock gene polymorphisms and type 2 diabetes and glycemic parameters, and studies examining non-core clock genes with information on environmental factors were included. A multi-level meta-analytical approach was used, and a weighted odds ratio was reported (PROSPERO, CRD42022337706).

Results: In total, 37 studies comprising 535,063 participants were included. CRY2 was associated with higher fasting blood glucose (OR: 1.07, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.11) and impaired glucose tolerance (OR: 1.02, CI: 1.00-1.04). Polymorphisms in MTNR1B were associated with a greater risk of type 2 diabetes. CLOCK was associated with lower risk of type 2 diabetes (OR: 0.94, CI: 0.89-1.00), and PER3 was associated with lower fasting insulin (OR: 0.94, CI: 0.91-0.97) and lower risk of insulin resistance (OR: 0.92, CI: 0.88-0.95). These associations reflect pooled variant-level effects within genes, and the effects of certain variants were modified by diet, alcohol consumption, physical activity, sleep, and length of daylight.

Conclusions: Specific polymorphisms in circadian genes, including CRY2,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 535,063 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free