Evidence Hub

A prospective evaluation of levofloxacin-based triple therapy for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection in Australia

Katelaris PH, Katelaris AL

Internal medicine journal, 2017

107 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-line Helicobacter pylori eradication failure is a common and challenging problem.

AIM: To assess the efficacy of salvage levofloxacin-based triple therapy in Australia.

METHODS: Prospective patients referred after prior treatment failure(s) were prescribed esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g and levofloxacin 500 mg each twice daily for 10 days. All patients received detailed written and verbal adherence support. Outcome assessment was by 13 C-urea breath test and/or histology and urease test.

RESULTS: In 150 consecutive, evaluable patients (66% female, mean age 54 ± 14 years; six smokers), the main indications for treatment were peptic ulcer disease (17%), increased gastric cancer risk (20%), symptoms (35%) and other risk reduction (28%). The median number of previous treatments was 2 (range 1-7). Eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 90% (intention to treat (ITT)) and 91% (per-protocol (PP)) of patients. The eradication rate did not differ according to the type or number of prior treatments: 93% when ≤2 (n = 107) compared with 84% after three or more prior treatments (n = 43; P = 0.13) or with age, ethnicity or indication for treatment but it was higher in females (ITT 94 vs 82%, P = 0.04). Adherence was excellent (95%). No serious adverse effects were observed; mild adverse effects were reported in 11%. No primary levofloxacin resistance was observed in 20 concurrent cases.

CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of this levofloxacin-based triple therapy…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 107 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free