Evidence Hub

Circadian rhythm disruption and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

T. Heydari, Prakash Ramdass

AJOG Global Reports, 2025

1,100 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Objective The aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if circadian rhythm disruption (CRD) is associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Our objective was to pool the overall mean differences in biomarkers of CRD (including melatonin levels, morning and evening cortisol levels, and sleep efficiency) between PCOS patients and controls. We hypothesized that CRD will be more prominent in patients with PCOS. Data sources A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted from inception until 2024 using the following MeSH terms “circadian rhythm” OR “sleep disturbance” OR “melatonin” AND “polycystic ovary syndrome.” Citation search supplemented the systematic database search. Study eligibility criteria Inclusion criteria were women with PCOS, original case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies that identify parameters of CRD (melatonin, cortisol, and sleep disturbance). Exclusion criteria were women with endocrine and metabolic co-morbidities, menopausal women, case reports, review studies, animal studies, abstracts, and conference presentations. There was no time restriction for year of publication. Study appraisal and synthesis methods Two investigators (T.H. and P.R.) assessed the quality of the studies included using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Forest plots were created using the Open Meta Analyst software. Publication bias was assessed in Egger's and Begg's…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,100 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free