Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetic and dynamic study of levofloxacin and rifampicin in bone and joint infections

Guillaume M, Garraffo R, Bensalem M, Janssen C, Bland S, Gaillat J, Bru JP

Medecine et maladies infectieuses, 2012

17 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of levofloxacin and rifampicin in bone and joint infections. The optimal dose regimen of these two antibiotics has not been documented yet.

PATIENTS AND METHOD: We performed plasma dosage for each antibiotic in patients with a bone and joint infection requiring treatment with a levofloxacin and rifampicin combination. We then computed the 6 hours post dose area under the concentration-time curve (AUC(0-6h)), the peak plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the inhibitory concentration curve (AUIC), and the peak-to-minimum-inhibitory-concentration ratio (Cmax/MIC). The pharmacodynamic results were then compared to the published thresholds of effectiveness. The doses used were levofloxacin 500 mg bid and rifampicin 20mg/kg per day.

RESULTS: The plasma of 17 patients was dosed. The average AUC(0-6h) for levofloxacin was 46.59 mg.h/l, the average Cmax 10.7 mg/l, the average AUIC 932, and the average Cmax/MIC 107.5. The averages for rifampicin were 42.2mg.h/l, 11.8 mg/l, 11,125 and 1514. Given that bone concentration of levofloxacin is 30% that of the plasma concentration, that concentration was divided by three to estimate bone concentration.

CONCLUSION: The optimal thresholds of pharmacodynamic effectiveness were obtained for most patients with levofloxacin at 500 mg bid. Additional studies are still required to determine the optimal rifampicin dose.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free