Evidence Hub

Stroke risk prediction using machine learning: a prospective cohort study of 0.5 million Chinese adults

M. Chun, R. Clarke, B. Cairns, D. Clifton, D. Bennett, Yi-Ping Chen, Yu Guo, P. Pei et al.

J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc., 2021

836 participants · 84 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To compare Cox models, machine learning (ML), and ensemble models combining both approaches, for prediction of stroke risk in a prospective study of Chinese adults. Materials and Methods We evaluated models for stroke risk at varying intervals of follow-up (10% predicted 9-yr stroke risk) by selectively applying either a GBT or Cox model based on individual-level characteristics. Results For 9-yr stroke risk prediction, GBT provided the best discrimination (AUROC: 0.833 in men, 0.836 in women) and calibration, with consistent results in each interval of follow-up. The ensemble approach yielded incrementally higher accuracy (men: 76%, women: 80%), specificity (men: 76%, women: 81%), and positive predictive value (men: 26%, women: 24%) compared to any of the single-model approaches. Discussion and Conclusion Among several approaches, an ensemble model combining both GBT and Cox models achieved the best performance for identifying individuals at high risk of stroke in a contemporary study of Chinese adults. The results highlight the potential value of expanding the use of ML in clinical practice.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 836 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free