Evidence Hub

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of levofloxacin therapy for household contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Vietnam

Tasnim Hasan, A. T. Nguyen, H. B. Nguyễn, N. Nguyễn, H. Yapa, S. Graham, Ben J. Marais, G. B. Marks et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Summary Background Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) threatens global TB control, on account of poor treatment outcomes, high treatment toxicity and costs. Recent trials demonstrated the effectiveness of six-months of levofloxacin (6Lfx) to prevent TB disease among high-risk contacts. However, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy has not previously been evaluated. Methods The VQUIN study was a double-blinded randomised control trial in Vietnam assessing the effectiveness of 6Lfx in household contacts of multidrug resistant/rifampicin resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) to prevent progression to TB disease. Incorporating in-trial costs and effectiveness outcomes from the VQUIN trial, we developed a closed cohort, decision-analytic Markov model to assess the cost effectiveness of 6Lfx versus placebo in a cohort exposed to MDR/RR-TB in Vietnam. Findings Over a 20-year time horizon, the provision of 6Lfx preventative therapy to household contacts of people infected with MDR/RR-TB was found to gain a total of 40.1 QALYs per 1000 population and save US$23,145 per 1000 population, indicating the strategy was cost saving. MDR/RR-TB cases averted over 20 years was 19.9 per 1000 population treated with 6Lfx, and the number of deaths averted was 3.2 per 1000 people treated. Interpretation 6Lfx therapy is a cost-saving strategy to reduce the incidence of active disease in household contacts of MDR/RR-TB in a resource-limited setting. Funding 10.13039/501100000925National Health and Medical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free