Evidence Hub

Prevalence of Complications Leading to a Health Care Contact After Transrectal Prostate Biopsies: A Prospective, Controlled, Multicenter Study Based on a Selected Study Cohort

J. Knaapila, M. Gunell, K. Syvänen, O. Ettala, Esa Kähkönen, T. Lamminen, M. Seppänen, I. Jambor et al.

European Urology Focus, 2017

294 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) is typically considered a safe procedure. However, infectious complications have been increasing.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the contemporary rate of biopsy-related infectious and noninfectious complications after TRUS-Bx, and identify potential risk factors associated with the complications.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a prospective multicenter study and a substudy of a trial investigating the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer diagnosis (multi-IMPROD, NCT02241122).

INTERVENTION

TRUS-Bx was performed for all patients included in the study. Ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or fosfomycin was administered for antibiotic prophylaxis.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

On inclusion, patients completed a detailed questionnaire and underwent MRI scanning. Antibiotic prophylaxis was prospectively recorded. After collection of a rectal swab, TRUS-Bx (total of 14-18 biopsy cores) was performed and. The rectal swabs were cultured and the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of Escherichia coli strains was analyzed. Biopsy complications leading to a visit to a health care unit were recorded and potential risk factors for complications were analyzed.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twelve of the 294 patients (4.1%) had a biopsy-related complication, of which two (0.7%) were infectious and managed in the outpatient setting. Some 11% of the patients had an E. coli strain resistant to the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 294 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free