Evidence Hub

124. Impact of Levofloxacin MIC on Outcomes with Levofloxacin Step-down Therapy in Enterobacteriaceae Bloodstream Infections

M. White, Kerry A. Lenzi, L. Dutcher, S. Saw, S. Morgan, Shawn Binkley, Vasilios Athans, Christo Cimino et al.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2019

4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reduced the levofloxacin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoint from ≤2 to ≤0.5 mg/L for Enterobacteriaceae in 2019 guidelines. The reduction is based on Monte Carlo simulations for a levofloxacin dose of 750 mg daily. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in clinical outcomes in the treatment of Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia with levofloxacin step-down therapy retrospectively comparing patients with isolates with low levofloxacin MICs (≤0.5 mg/L) to high MICs (1–2 mg/L). Methods This retrospective, two-center cohort study included patients ≥18 years of age with a monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia with a levofloxacin MIC ≤2 mg/L from March 2017 through December 2018. Patients had to have received treatment with ≥3 days of levofloxacin step-down therapy, initial intravenous therapy with an agent active against the isolated organism, and total duration not exceeding 16 days from first negative blood culture. A subset of patients whose isolates had low levofloxacin MICs were randomly selected for comparison to all patients with high levofloxacin MICs in a 3:1 ratio. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of recurrence and mortality within 30 days of completion of the antibiotic course. Secondary outcomes included post-culture length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission rate. Results Thirty-three patients with high MIC and 99 with low MIC were included.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free