Evidence Hub

Antituberculosis drug prescribing for inpatients in a national tuberculosis hospital in China, 2011-2015

An J, Bai X, Gao M, Chu N, Huang H, Xu H, Zhang X, Li B et al.

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance, 2018

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe trends in antituberculosis drug prescribing for inpatients from 2011-2015 in a Chinese national tuberculosis (TB) hospital.

METHODS: This retrospective study, performed in March 2016, reviewed the medical records of all inpatients from Beijing Chest Hospital diagnosed with TB between 2011-2015. Medication used for TB treatment during the inpatient period was recorded.

RESULTS: A total of 11465 inpatients were enrolled in the study. The most frequently prescribed drug for inpatients was isoniazid (71.2%; 8164/11465), followed by ethambutol (67.5%; 7738/11465), pyrazinamide (59.7%; 6839/11465) and rifampicin (40.0%; 4589/11465). In addition, amikacin (16.5%; 1889/11465), levofloxacin (33.0%; 3789/11465), para-aminosalicylic acid (12.4%; 1422/11465) and clarithromycin (3.5%; 406/11465) were the most common drugs used in the treatment of inpatients for Group II, III, IV and V drugs, respectively. A significant increasing trend in prescribing was found for rifampicin, pyrazinamide, capreomycin, moxifloxacin, prothionamide, para-aminosalicylic acid, cycloserine, clofazimine and linezolid, respectively, whilst there was a significant decreasing trend in the rate of prescribing of ethambutol, amikacin, levofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and clarithromycin during the 5-year study period (Ptrend<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that prescription of anti-TB drugs varied greatly across clinical diagnostic categories, treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free