Evidence Hub

Crush injury syndrome in earthquakes: a systematic review and meta-analysis on its frequency and complications

Rostami P, Jafari Rouhi A, Hajebrahimi R, Faridaalaee G, Mostafaei Yonjali R, Shahsavarinia K, Salehi-Pourmehr H

BMC emergency medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Crush syndrome is a life-threatening systemic complication of traumatic rhabdomyolysis and a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following earthquakes. Despite its clinical significance, a comprehensive synthesis of its global epidemiology, management, and outcomes is lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate the evidence on CS in earthquake victims.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251177534). Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL) were searched from inception through January 2024 for observational studies of earthquake casualties with CS. Outcomes included mortality, dialysis requirement, acute kidney injury (AKI), and other complications. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Fifty studies (1988-2023), primarily from Turkey, Iran, and China, were included. Substantial heterogeneity was observed, largely due to inconsistent definitions of CS. The pooled proportion of patients requiring dialysis was 0.49 (95% CI 0.40-0.58; I²=96.95%, 38 studies). The overall pooled mortality was 0.08 (95% CI 0.06-0.10; I²=93.0%, 39 studies), with significant regional variation (1% to 26%). AKI was the most frequent complication (pooled proportion 0.49; 95% CI 0.38-0.59). Marked creatine kinase elevation and metabolic derangements were consistently reported.

Conclusions: CS following earthquakes carries a high burden of renal failure,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free