Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of antioxidants with or without exercise training improving muscle condition in older adults

Wang Y, He Z, Long C, Li Y, Yuan Y, Huang T

Scientific reports, 2025

1,714 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

Oxidative stress and physical inactivity are regarded as important mechanisms contributing to muscle loss. However, the efficacy of antioxidants and their potential synergy with exercise training remain controversial for older population. The study aimed to evaluate the effects of antioxidants, either combined with or without exercise, on improving muscle strength, mass, and physical performance in older adults. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on muscle condition in subjects aged 55 years or older. The search period covered from the inception of each database until June 10, 2024. A total of 39 RCTs involving 1714 participants were included. The meta-analysis presented that antioxidants alone could enhance muscle strength in 1 repetition maximum (RM) in leg press and physical function in the older population. Exercise alone could increase the walking distance of 6 min walk more than antioxidants alone. The combination of antioxidants and exercise further improved 1RM in leg press, usual walking speed and walking distance of 6 min walk compared to antioxidants alone. Additionally, this combination enhanced handgrip strength, 1RM in leg press and walking distance of 6 min walk more than exercise alone. This meta-analysis demonstrated that antioxidants alone had positive effects on muscle condition in older individuals. However, the combination of antioxidants and exercise was more…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,714 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free