Evidence Hub

Kluyvera Infections in Humans: A Systematic Review

Maraki S, Mavromanolaki VE, Iliaki-Giannakoudaki E, Kasimati A

Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2026

97 participants

Abstract

Objective: Kluyvera species are Gram-negative rods, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative, and glucose-fermenting members of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Although often considered saprophytic, Kluyvera can cause opportunistic infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, with severe underlying medical conditions. The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate all published cases of human infections by Kluyvera spp., through a systematic literature review.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus databases for articles providing data related to the epidemiology, clinical features, and microbiology of Kluyvera human infections.

Results: In total, 73 studies provided information on 97 patients with Kluyvera infections. The mean age of the patients was 39.5 years and most (53.6%) were females. The most frequently reported types of infection were bacteremia, urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections, and soft tissue infections, and more than half of them were community-acquired. Comorbidities were common in majority of the patients, and almost half of these were immunosuppressed. K. ascorbata was the most commonly identified species (59.8%), followed by Kluyvera cryocrescens (23.7%), Kluyvera intermedia (3.1%), and Kluyvera georgiana (1.0%). High rates of resistance were recorded for ampicillin (78.1%), 1st-generation cephalosporins (52.1%), and 2nd-generation cephalosporins (43.8%). Third-generation cephalosporins were the most commonly used…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 97 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free