Evidence Hub

Risk factors and mortality associated with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea at a VA hospital

Ursula Changela, J. Cannon, C. Aneziokoro, Palak Shah, Lizy Thottapurathu, J. Lentino

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2004

33 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of certain patient co-morbidities and antibiotics in the development of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD). Hospitalized patients developing CDAD during a specified period were compared with a cohort of patients, matched by age, without a diagnosis of CDAD, who were hospitalized during the same time period. Data collection included demographics, hospital ward, co-morbid conditions, antibiotics received, and mortality. Gender and age were similar in both groups. Co-morbid conditions significantly associated with the case group included cancer and COPD. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics in the case versus control group included levofloxacin, intravenous vancomycin, clindamycin, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The case group was associated with a higher mortality rate.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free