Evidence Hub

Improving quercetin bioavailability: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human intervention studies

Liu L, Barber E, Kellow NJ, Williamson G

Food chemistry, 2025

88 citations

Abstract

This systematic review evaluated a total of 31 included human intervention studies that have assessed methods to improve quercetin bioavailability from different formulations and food matrices using urine or blood samples up to July 2024. The bioavailability of quercetin in humans was affected by several factors. 1) Chemical structure: Quercetin-3-O-oligoglucosides exhibited 2-fold higher bioavailability than quercetin-3-O-glucoside, 10-fold higher than quercetin-3-O-rutinoside and ∼ 20-fold higher than quercetin aglycone. 2) Modification of physicochemical properties: In comparison to quercetin aglycone, the quercetin-3-O-glucoside-γ-cyclodextrin inclusion complex showed a 10.8-fold increase in bioavailability, while the self-emulsifying fenugreek galactomannans and lecithin encapsulation, and lecithin phytosome, showed a 62- and 20.1-fold increase, respectively. 3) Food matrix effects: the addition of dietary fats and fibre increased bioavailability by ∼2-fold. This review summarises key factors that enhance quercetin bioavailability, contributing to the development of more effective and practical quercetin supplements or functional foods for better bioactivity of quercetin in humans.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free