Evidence Hub

Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Pathogens Causing Intra-abdominal Infections in Pediatric Patients in Europe-SMART 2011-2014

Lob SH, Badal RE, Hackel MA, Sahm DF

Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, 2017

1,259 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most common type of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) is appendicitis, which occurs most frequently in children and young adults. Yet, few studies on the microbiology of pediatric IAI are available, which is problematic because antimicrobial therapy for IAI usually needs to be initiated before microbiological culture results are available. With this study, we aimed to assess whether resistance patterns in pediatric IAI in Europe that would help clinicians select empiric therapy can be identified.

METHODS: Gram-negative pathogens (n = 1259) were collected from pediatric patients as part of the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) in 16 European countries from 2011 to 2014. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype were determined by broth microdilution according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, and susceptibility was interpreted according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. An IAI was defined as hospital- or community-associated if cultured ≥48 or <48 hours after admission, respectively.

RESULTS: Overall, only imipenem and amikacin exceeded 90% susceptibility when all Gram-negative pathogens were combined, and ertapenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and levofloxacin reached at least 85%. However, resistance, ESBL-positive, and multidrug-resistance (MDR) rates were substantially higher in isolates from…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,259 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free