Evidence Hub

Effects of Fluoroquinolones on Aortic Aneurysm or Dissection Processes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Wu ZY, Yang Y, Li ZL, Zhao WX, Chen ZG, Diao YP, Li YJ

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: This systematic review/meta-analysis investigated the risks of fluoroquinolones (FQs) for aortic aneurysms (thoracic/abdominal) and Stanford A/B dissections.

Methods: We searched EMBASE, Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases in February 2024. Eligible observational studies were those that presented adjusted risk estimates for aortic aneurysm or dissection (AAD) incidence, aortic-specific mortality, or all-cause mortality in FQ-treated versus untreated unexposed populations.

Results: A total of 13 studies were included (36,224,419 participants), eight of which were cohort studies, two were nested case-control studies, and three were case-crossover designs. FQ exposure was associated with significantly elevated de novo AAD risk within 30 days (relative risk (RR) = 3.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [2.72, 4.24]; heterogeneity: I 2 = 41.5%, p = 0.11) and 60 days (RR = 3.53, 95% CI = [2.78, 4.49]; heterogeneity: I 2 = 87.0%, p I 2 = 0%, p = 0.80). Subgroup analysis demonstrated comparable aortic dissection (AD) and aortic aneurysm (AA) risks, except for a significantly increased de novo AA risk at 30 days (RR = 9.13, 95% CI = [6.05, 13.78]; heterogeneity: I 2 = 68.7%, p = 0.07) and 60 days (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = [1.27, 2.26]; heterogeneity: I 2 = 52%, p = 0.10).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found a significant association between FQ use and short-term AAD risk. These results suggest that clinicians should weigh the risks of AAD before prescribing FQs,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free