Evidence Hub

Nasal Potential Studies Utilizing CFTR Modulators (UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science)

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2011

32 participants

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop new biomarkers for studies of cystic fibrosis (CF). Defects in the gene encoding Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Regulator (CFTR) cause CF, an autosomal recessive disorder affecting mainly the pulmonary and digestive tract, leading to early death largely due to progressive loss of pulmonary function. In vitro experiments show that quercetin - a dietary supplement with a well-established safety profile for human use, including clinical trials in a variety of disorders encompassing cancer, heart disease, and as an anti-inflammatory agent - induces activation of CFTR. The nasal potential difference (NPD) test is a measurement of voltage across the nasal membrane and as a fundamental biomarker for CFTR activity in vivo. The NPD is a useful, well-established tool in CF research to determine both diagnoses as well as to measure the effect of new therapies. In vitro experiments show that quercetin induces activation of CFTR additive to that seen with current NPD reagents. In addition, it activates rescued mutant CFTR in vitro (∆F508 CFTR the most common cause of CF), whereas conventional agonists do not. Preliminary in vivo experiments mirrored these results and show that quercetin activates CFTR in human (n=12) NPD tests. Importantly, quercetin perfusion was well-tolerated by a validated sinus questionnaire and physician assessed nasal examination rating. These studies provide strong support for use of quercetin as potentiator of CFTR Cl-…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 32 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free