Evidence Hub

Comparing the Pharmacological Profile of Different Quercetin Formulations in Healthy Volunteers

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2022

10 participants

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of quercetin in healthy participants after the administration of different formulations in a single- and multiple-dose phase. In the single-dose study, plasma uptake (AUC0-24 and Cmax) of standard quercetin is compared with that of LipoMicel®-a novel food-grade delivery form of quercetin. In the multiple dose study, accumulating plasma concentrations of formulated quercetin are observed over 72hrs, after repeated doses of LipoMicel treatments (AUC0-72).

At least ten healthy adults participate in an open-label, diet-controlled, crossover, plasma uptake study. Participants receive three different doses (250 mg, 500 mg or 1000 mg) of quercetin aglycone orally.

Conditions: Pharmacokinetics.

Primary outcome: AUC: the area under the concentration-time curve; Cmax: maximum plasma concentration; Tmax: the time point of maximum plasma concentration.

Enrollment: 10 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free