Evidence Hub

Evaluation of the presence of integrons, sul and smqnr genes and the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates

Mokhtari Bibalan M, Mojtahedi A, Mahdieh N, Jafari A, Atrkar Roushan Z, Arya MJ

Indian journal of medical microbiology, 2024

54 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this investigation was to examine the mechanisms associated with antibiotic resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates retrieved from hospitalized patients undergoing open heart surgery in a Heart Center located in Tehran, Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This investigation encompassed a cross-sectional study of 60 S. maltophilia isolates, which were procured from diverse clinical specimens. Primary identification of the isolates was conducted through conventional microbiologic methods and subsequently verified by means of PCR primers. The E-test was utilized to establish the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). PCR was then employed to ascertain the antibiotic resistance genes (sul1, sul2, Smqnr and intl1 - intl3).

RESULTS: In this study, a total of sixty clinical isolates of S. maltophilia were collected, with the majority of them being obtained from Intensive Care Units (ICU) (n = 54; 90%). The disk diffusion method yielded results indicating that 55% of the isolates were sensitive to minocycline, whereas 30% were intermediate and 15% were found to be resistant. Additionally, the MIC results revealed that the resistant rates of the isolates towards ceftazidime, cotrimoxazole and levofloxacin were 46.7%, 1.7% and 5%, respectively. The PCR amplification of three classes of integrons genes indicated that fifteen (25%) of the isolates carried int1, while no detection for intl2 and intl3 was reported. Furthermore, the prevalence…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free