Evidence Hub

Quercetin Attenuates Metabolic Dysfunction and Remodels a Hypothalamic m6A–Leptin–Melanocortin Transcriptional Network in High-Fat-Diet-Fed Rats

García-Rivero AA, Miliar-García Á, Ávila-Guerrero A, Martínez-Godínez MdlÁ, Castillo-Hernández MdC, Guevara-Balcázar G, Domínguez-López A

2026

8 participants

Abstract

Background: : /Objectives: High-fat diet (HFD) feeding disrupts systemic metabolism and hypothalamic mechanisms that coordinate energy balance. Whether quercetin modifies the coordinated transcriptional systems linking m6A-related regulation with leptin-insulin and melanocortin biology remains unclear. We examined the metabolic and hypothalamic transcriptional response to quercetin during chronic HFD exposure.

Methods:: Male Wistar rats were studied for 16 weeks in a 2 × 2 factorial design: Control (n = 8), Control + quercetin (n = 5), HFD (n = 5), and HFD + quercetin (n = 6). Quercetin was administered orally at 100 mg/kg/day. Body weight, fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance, visceral adiposity, serum lipids, and terminal tissue measures were evaluated. Hypothalamic expression of 21 transcripts spanning m6A regulation, leptin-insulin signaling, melanocortin-associated genes, and oxidative response was quantified by RT-qPCR. Gene-level inference was complemented by principal component analysis, PERMANOVA, module-level analyses, bootstrap resampling, leave-one-sample-out sensitivity testing, and treatment-adjusted gene-gene covariance.

Results:: At week 16, HFD + quercetin reduced glucose AUC relative to HFD by 2415 mg·min/dL (q = 0.0029), visceral fat by 5.16 g (q = 0.004), and triglycerides by 47.03 mg/dL (q < 0.001), without a corresponding difference in final body weight. Sixteen of 21 transcripts met the predefined robustness criteria for the HFD + quercetin versus…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 8 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free